Mick Fanning and Carissa Moore ring the bell at the Rip Curl Pro

winners3969bells14kirstin_l.jpgBELLS BEACH, VIC/Australia (Wednesday, April 23, 2014): A thrilling Finals day at the Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach, stop No. 3 on the 2014 Samsung Galaxy ASP World Championship Tour (WCT), saw Mick Fanning (AUS) and Carissa Moore (HAW) ring the Bell and claim victory at the historic event. The day started with the Women’s competition where Moore came out on top at Bells Bowl. The competition then moved to Winkipop for the Men’s Semifinals and Finals where Fanning reigned supreme.

Mick Fanning (AUS), reigning three-time ASP World Champion today claimed his third Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach event title in an exciting back-and-forth battle over fellow tour veteran Taj Burrow (AUS). Both surfers posted excellent scores, using their contrasting styles to unload powerful cracks and carves, but both also made errors, falling off and missing some great waves. It was Fanning who capitalized when it counted by posting an 8.00 and an 8.83, Burrow held a heat high 9.63, but was let down by his second score 3.83. Fanning previously despatched Owen Wright (AUS) in the Quarterfinals and Julian Wilson (AUS) in the Semifinals.

“After that result (13th) in Margaret River I went home and worked really hard and I’m so pleased that the hard work paid off. Congratulations to Taj (Burrow), I’ve never been so nervous for nine minutes of my life, he surfed amazingly,” said Mick Fanning. “We got to surf everywhere at this event which was awesome, we got to surf the Bowl, Rincon and to finish at Winkipop. It’s always been my dream to surf a Heat at Winkipop. This is such a special event for me and I feel comfortable here. With the calibre of surfers on Tour at the moment there’s never an easy Heat and it keeps it so exciting.”

“I felt really good today and I had a fun today,” said Taj Burrow. “I had a good Final with Mick (Fanning) but it was rough losing knowing I needed a 7 because I felt like there were so many opportunities to get one, but that’s the way it goes. There’s nothing better than ringing that Bell. It’s such an iconic event and I’m glad to have my name on the Bell. I’d love to have it on there a second time but I’ll take this result, put it in the bank and carry on to the next event.” 

Carissa Moore (HAW), two-time ASP Women’s World Champion, today claimed her second consecutive Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach event title with a sensational performance. Moore dispatched Sally Fitzgibbons (AUS) in the Semifinals and went on to take out 2013 ASP WCT runner-up Tyler Wright (AUS) in a rematch of the 2013 Final. Both competitors went blow-for-blow in the pumping conditions. It was a heroic fight from the young Australian, but it was Moore’s day with the reigning event winner showing off incredible commitment on every turn and carve. Moore’s win is her second of the 2014 WCT season and sees her retain her No. 1 spot in the ASP WCT rankings. Moore’s road to victory was a long one after she was forced to surf in every Round of the competition following defeats at the hands of Dimity Stoyle in Round 1 and Coco Ho in Round 3. 

"I'm speechless right now," Carissa Moore said. "That was an amazing Final! We were having such a blast, I just wanted to talk to Tyler (Wright) because the waves were so fun and it felt like we were having a fun free surf. I know she' ssuch an amazing surfer and will be in ASP World Title contention at the end of the year, so I knew I had to be at my best. It's been a long Australian leg with three events in a row and it couldn't have been much better for me, two wins and a quarterfinal and to finish by winning at Bells is so unique and special."

“Carissa (Moore) is just an amazing human and a great winner,” said Tyler Wright. “When I hit the water it’s all about surfing and catching waves and I like to enjoy what I’m doing and be in the moment, not worry about anything else that I can’t control. I just want to surf the way I surf.” 

Reigning event winner Adriano de Souza (BRA) left the competition in equal 5th place after suffering defeat at the hands of event runner-up Taj Burrow (AUS) in the Quarterfinals. Solid surf provided the perfect work bench for de Souza who took to waves looking like he was destined for the Semifinal, but Burrow had other plans. Stealing the momentum of the Heat, Burrow was able to select larger waves and produce larger carves, advancing his way though the competition.

“I started well but the second wave I picked the wrong one and Taj (Burrow) got the opportunity,” said Adriano de Souza. “I did my best, that’s all I can say. I’m really looking forward to Brazil, it will be another good event for me. This year will be a learning curve for me. Let’s see what I can do in Brazil. I’m happy that I got as far of the Quarterfinals but I wish was able defended my title.”

11-time ASP World Champion, Kelly Slater (USA), was eliminated from the competition in the Quarterfinals by Hawaiian prodigy John John Florence in a repeat of Round 4. The highly anticipated Heat saw both surfers making unusual fumbles throughout the battle. Slater held the lead with just a few minutes remaining, but a final dash from the Hawaiian saw him ride out a 6.83 maneuver, enough to snatch the victory over the 4-time event winner. Florence went on to face Taj Burrow in the Semifinals and leaves the competition in equal 3rd place.

“I had the waves to win the Heat and he (Florence) capitalized on my mistakes,” said Kelly Slater. “It was a slow Heat so the nerves build and I forced a couple of turns. I think after I blew it on that one wave it hit my confidence. I’ll be hard on myself on that one for the next few hours I think. I’ve been a little nervous this whole contest and I haven’t felt real confident in my surfing lately. I’ve had a couple of things nagging me and I haven’t been free surfing enough. I’m happy for John John though. I’ve had a couple of Quarterfinals and a Semifinal so the Australian leg hasn’t been too bad for me.”

Five-time ASP Women’s World Champion, Stephanie Gilmore (AUS), was eliminated by event runner-up Tyler Wright in their hotly anticipated Semifinal match-up. Wright was quick to establish a lead over her elder and timed each of her wave selections perfectly to pull the big scores. Gilmore had ample opportunity to take back the lead but a further 9.00 and 8.77 secured Wright’s spot in the Final.

“It was a difficult Heat,” said Stephanie Gilmore. “Tyler’s the sort of girl that you can’t let get any waves if you want to win a Heat. She caught a wave on my priority and it was a bomb and got a 9-point ride. Unfortunately I’ll take a third place. I’ve never had so many Heats where I’m always on my toes. At the start of my career it came to me a lot easier but now you really have to work hard and get 8s and 9s in every Heat. It’s great for the sport and the waves were great today so we had a really nice canvas to perform on.”

Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach Final Results:

  • Final: Mick Fanning (AUS) 16.83 def. Taj Burrow (AUS) 13.46

Rip Curl Women’s Pro Bells Beach Final Results:

  • Final: Carissa Moore (HAW) 16.23 def. Tyler Wright (AUS) 15.77

Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach Semifinal Results:

  • Semifinal 1: Taj Burrow (AUS) 14.43 def. John John Florence (HAW) 13.43
  • Semifinal 2: Mick Fanning (AUS) 18.20 def. Julian Wilson (AUS) 17.36

Rip Curl Women’s Pro Bells Beach Semifinal Results:

  • Semifinal 1: Carissa Moore (HAW) 11.10 def. Sally Fitzgibbons (AUS) 10.53
  • Semifinal 2: Tyler Wright (AUS) 17.77 def. Stephanie Gilmore (AUS) 13.77

Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach Quarterfinal Results:

  • Quarterfinal 1: Taj Burrow (AUS) 15.50 def. Adriano de Souza (BRA) 13.16
  • Quarterfinal 2: John John Florence (HAW) 13.13 def. Kelly Slater (USA) 11.10
  • Quarterfinal 3: Julian Wilson (AUS) 17.53 def. Joel Parkinson (AUS) 15.34
  • Quarterfinal 4: Mick Fanning (AUS) 13.16 def. Owen Wright (AUS) 11.37

Rip Curl Pro Bells Beach Round 5 Results:

  • Heat 1: Adriano de Souza (BRA) 16.27 def. Gabriel Medina (BRA) 13.33
  • Heat 2: Kelly Slater (USA) 15.26 def. Adam Melling (AUS) 12.44
  • Heat 3: Julian Wilson (AUS) 17.30 def. Jordy Smith (ZAF) 17.26
  • Heat 4: Owen Wright (AUS) 13.37 def. Fred Patacchia (HAW) 13.10

Comments

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 9:42am

Interesting reading the blowups regarding Jordy's heat loss to Wilson. "Jordy should've got a Perfect 10" seems to be the accepted line of thinking. Sean Doherty even claims to have spoken to no less than six past world champs who claim it should've been a 10.

But shit, his very first turn, while undoubtedly powerful and committed - perhaps the most committed turn I've ever seen - had a flaw in it. There was a quick slip in the transition about three-quarters of the way through, the recovery was equally quick and adroit, yet it was a flaw nonetheless.

Hard to believe that six world champs would have missed that slip up. Brad Gerlach sure didn't: "He made a mistake on the first turn though. Too much weight on the back foot but he came out of it so clean so the untrained eye didn't mark him down for it."

My line of thinking is not a perfect turn so not a perfect ten, but that philosophy doesn't appear to be shared by others. So then, what is the criteria for a perfect wave??

rat-race's picture
rat-race's picture
rat-race Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 10:34am

There is no such thing as a 10. The whole concept that a 10 should ever be given is flawed. By giving anything a perfect score leaves no room for differentiation if another surfer in the same heat goes (even slightly) harder/stronger/better than the wave that scored a 10.
10 is unachievable. End of story.
10's are given by way of proving that the "judges" have no idea what the hell they are doing.

seal's picture
seal's picture
seal Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 10:49am

Yes and how could John John's be a 10 but Jordy ripped the bag outa his and not make the score? Very confusing to say the least!

mk1's picture
mk1's picture
mk1 Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 11:21am

Either way, Jordy lost that heat with his 7, not with the 9.93/10.

JJF's air was pretty sweet - the vertical tweek to it was something new, are McTwists the next thing in airs??

leckiep's picture
leckiep's picture
leckiep Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 11:36am

Sharp comment mk1. Although it does seem that when it comes down to buzzer beaters, the absolute value of the score is given less focus than answering the 'who won the heat' question.

Subjective judging is the nature of the beast that is Pro surfing, and multitudes of differing opinions is the nature of the beast that is internet commenting...

You can either accept it as par for the course, choose not to watch the tour if it irks you too much, or try and join a club/association and create change from within.

Otherwise, I just love watching the competition. Great comp.

burgsurfer's picture
burgsurfer's picture
burgsurfer Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 1:10pm

I been watching pro surfing since 1989. Anyone else notice how Kelly has gone from "the best" in small surf to "the best" in big surf as he has aged and new young guns have arrived?? Interesting transition. In 1990, 1991, 1992 he was just phenomenal in comparison to the rest in small surf. From 1993 till about 2008 he has been phenomenal in comparrison to the rest in both small and big. From 2008 till present he is the man in bigger surf and not so much in the small stuff. Big being 6ft plus. Small being 4ft and below.

wally's picture
wally's picture
wally Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 2:10pm

It all boosts the numbers registering on the ASP site so fists can be shaken at the heat analyzer. The post heat home reviewing is one of the better entertainments with pro surfing.
The judges are under a lot of time pressure and do a good job.
When you get a contentious score, there is usually knowledgeable people on both the for and against sides.

radiationrules's picture
radiationrules's picture
radiationrules Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 3:14pm

I agree with liekiep. Why is there so much anger about an evolving system? All systems evolve. Constructive criticism will lead to constructive change. My wish is that commentators could overcome there desire to comment with an underlying tone of "it's not perfect, so we shouldn't have a competition".

mikesurfallday's picture
mikesurfallday's picture
mikesurfallday Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 3:35pm

Judging is based on a personal opinion of a wave surfed. Some people like one thing while others don't. It doesn't make either way right or wrong. Just a matter of perception. Using the 5 judges and an average score between them nullifies any difference and the true score is revealed.

thermalben's picture
thermalben's picture
thermalben Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 3:53pm

Not necessarily Mike. Did you read blindboy's article "Judge not..."?

https://www.swellnet.com/news/surfpolitik/2014/04/17/judge-not

mikesurfallday's picture
mikesurfallday's picture
mikesurfallday Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 4:08pm

Yeah i read it, and yes it is a good argument for reducing differences moving forward, but at the end of the day people judge on their own opinion, and everyone's opinions differ. There will always be a difference. Every sport is the same, just thank god surfing is more consistent than some (i.e. NRL).

Overall, great surfing all round, and congrats to Mick & Carissa. They surfed great all finals day and deserved to win.

memlasurf's picture
memlasurf's picture
memlasurf Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 3:54pm

Interesting to hear Kelly's take on a one manoeuvre 10 pointer at a place like Bells. He says it is wrong even though he has benefitted from it. Reckons a wave like Bells should be ridden from start to end to make it the complete package. He believes he lost Bells to Mick because he didn't get the best waves or surf them as well as they should be. The big howdydoody is OK in Brazil as there is no wall only a close out.

wellymon's picture
wellymon's picture
wellymon Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 4:28pm

They are the best surfers in the world and fall off..............??
IMO falling off, falling over in any professional board sport is a true weakness.
Rate race a 10, I'm kinda down those lines as well !

woohcs's picture
woohcs's picture
woohcs Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 5:27pm

My 2 cents...Jordy was underscored on both his best waves/Julian was overscored...either way
Was amazing to see the level of commitment from all. The amount of surfers, male and female, that ended harshly on the rocks is like nothing I've seen before.

stickyson's picture
stickyson's picture
stickyson Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 7:22pm

It's not wether Jordy,s wave was worth a 10 it goes back to the spread and I know you are not meant to treat any one heat differently than any other in like conditions but when one wave is easily worth a full point more than one surfed earlier in the same heat and that wave is in the 9 range a 10 is a gimme.
Hate being cynical but if Jordy had of needed more than a 10 to win it would have been scored across the five Judges!!!

frog's picture
frog's picture
frog Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 7:51pm

Don't get the 10 thing for Jordy's wave at all. One huge carve then a spin off the top then a long dead section with nothing happening and a boring standard reverse in the shorebreak. Compared to some waves where there is action from start to finish and 4 or 5 huge carves it was hot and cold. Without the hype when I looked at it on youtube I kept thinking 8.5 maybe? Never a 10

frog's picture
frog's picture
frog Thursday, 24 Apr 2014 at 7:56pm

To me a true 9.9 (nothing is worth a 10) needs an incredible wave + surfer performance so you are going wow for the whole wave.

John Johns 10 was one amazing move, then a long long dead section and then a shorebreak move he barely made. In totality it did not seem like a 10.

radiationrules's picture
radiationrules's picture
radiationrules Friday, 25 Apr 2014 at 10:55am

with you on that frog. something mesmerising from start to finish is better than one show-pony move...but what if the JJ move is so inspirational that it leads to the next generation putting 6 of these together in a row as one mesmerising ride from start to finish? hopefully that's the evolution of our sport.

blindboy's picture
blindboy's picture
blindboy Friday, 25 Apr 2014 at 11:46am

I think history backs you up on that radiation. For a while there at the beginning of the professional era the points for manoeuvres judging system favoured surfers who strung together a long series of safe turns. In the end it proved so boring and unworkable that it had to go. If we look back at the following era the one "radical" move the surfers were aiming for, is now the standard expected in every turn.
On another issue I tend to agree with wellymon about the high error rate at both Bells and the Drug Aware. Slater looked like his boards weren't doing him any favours as they appeared to be over rotating in a lot of turns, spectacular when he recovered but looking a bit silly when he couldn't. Many of the other surfers were over amping and failing to assess just how quickly the wave goes fat at Bells and so were blowing what should have been routine turns. I wonder how many of them have professional psychological support? Keeping to an optimum level of arousal shouldn't be that difficult.

wally's picture
wally's picture
wally Friday, 25 Apr 2014 at 5:18pm

The judges failure to give Jordy his 10 will probably go into the folklore of the sport.
But still, when you look at the wave.

Started with a big cutback, which slipped. That meant the turn ended short of where Jordy would have planned. Jordy took advantage well. Rather than doing a rebound, he could move into more of a normal bottom turn. This allowed a great transition into that fins out, spinning top turn.
He threw another top turn, but got stuck up in the frothy lip.
He then did a nice, fairly standard, pro cutback.
After that, there were three slow mini cutbacks. Really just stalling manoeuves in pro land and a small aerial to finish.

So to recap,
A flawed turn, which allowed a great transition to a radical small wave top turn.
Followed by another top turn in which he got a bit bogged.
Then a nice cutty.
And a small aerial to finish.
Nice. I can see why not every judge gave it a 10.

asharper001's picture
asharper001's picture
asharper001 Saturday, 26 Apr 2014 at 3:18pm

To put it out there, Jordy has also been on the good end of some pretty horrific judging as well. Anybody remember his heat against Adam Robertson (Wildcard) at Bells in 2011? Robbo easily did Jordy up, even getting a triple barrel on probably the biggest, cleanest, most open wave of the heat. Still only gets an 8 point fuck all. Jordy's best wave is mostly wasted at the start with drawn out turns to get further down the point, gets a couple of (albeit quite nice) carves, and a smaller barrel at the end and gets a 9.5. Everybody cries a river over Jordy being (allegedly) ripped off but surf enough heats and you will get a bad call at some time (just ask Robbo).

seal's picture
seal's picture
seal Saturday, 26 Apr 2014 at 6:02pm

That's a great breakdown of Jordy's wave Wally!
Now can you do the same for John John's 10 please and please be just as objective so we can all learn how the judges would have come to their decisions.

wally's picture
wally's picture
wally Saturday, 26 Apr 2014 at 7:46pm

Seal, that's a very fair ask.

John John's 10.
John John started with a good aerial. He seemed to be the only person at Bells this year to get in a full rotation before landing. But, he then was got caught way behind in the foam due to his arguably ill-chosen manoeuvre. After taking 10 seconds to re-find the wall, but still with plenty of time to set up his final manoeuvre, John John badly misjudged his final turn to get lost in the foam again.
He did eventually end up on his feet, but who knows what happened in all that foam.
Obviously, you couldn't say he really landed this second manoeuvre.

Yeah, I wouldn't have given it a 10. But, I get confused about the technical fine points of some aerials. Aerial people seemed to think it was awesome. I look on a bit confused, but acknowledge there are a lot of fans who think that JJF's aerial was the highlight of the event.

I wasn't arguing that Jordy didn't deserve a 10. I was just arguing that it didn't seem unreasonable for not every judge to give it a 10. What were the scores 10, 10, 10, 9.8, 9.7. Final score 9.93. Apparently, the judges are terrible because the final score was out by seven 1000ths. I might have given it a 10, but I would think that giving it a tiny bit less was not unreasonable.

lostdoggy's picture
lostdoggy's picture
lostdoggy Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 11:00am
wally wrote:

I wasn't arguing that Jordy didn't deserve a 10. I was just arguing that it didn't seem unreasonable for not every judge to give it a 10. What were the scores 10, 10, 10, 9.8, 9.7. Final score 9.93. Apparently, the judges are terrible because the final score was out by seven 1000ths. I might have given it a 10, but I would think that giving it a tiny bit less was not unreasonable.

But what keeps getting missed from one side of the argument is that people are saying that it was Julian's wave which was over-scored, not the underscoring of Jordy's. Most people have no problem that Jordy's wave was not a 10 it's the fact that the judges have said themselves that the rightful winner will get through even with some individual wave score blunders on their part. The people on Jordy's side think there was clearly more than a point between the 9.93 and 9.13 so that's why a 10 (or 9.7+) needed to be given.

wellymon's picture
wellymon's picture
wellymon Saturday, 26 Apr 2014 at 8:23pm

J, J, J, J, Je, Je, Jo, Jo, John John,
Did his parents forget his name was John.....!

seal's picture
seal's picture
seal Sunday, 27 Apr 2014 at 8:02am

Thanks Wally and I'm not having a go at you but at the judges.
My thoughts were as yours, John John's air was good but he there abouts stuffed the rest of the wave because of it but still got a 10. Basically they gave a 10 for one turn that sure was a great turn but should have only scored high 8s or low 9s.
To me a 10 is for a perfect ride from start to finish, not just part of it!
But they seem to have a different way of interpreting the criteria than I and many others do.
So basically the judges need to read the criteria and score according to it not on their emotions at the time. Thats my 2 cents worth and I'm sure that's about all it's worth when it comes to making any difference to some of the judging decisions we get to see.

memlasurf's picture
memlasurf's picture
memlasurf Sunday, 27 Apr 2014 at 10:38pm

I agree the Robbo was really ripped off. They were beautiful waves that Robbo really respected. Jordy was nowhere near winning it. I am old so I remember Reno Abelira at Sunset getting the best waves, yet Shaun, new kid on the block, Tomson dicked around inside and won the event. History repeats. I think the judges have to rethink the 10 pointer for one trick. A lot of guys can do them now so they have to step beyond it. Julian, Jordy, Gabe, JJay, Filipe...do I need to go on can all produce some amazing airs but sometimes it seems like you have wasted and disrespected the wave. On a close out fine, superduper but on a long wave need to think it through. I thought Julians was amazing however him and JJay, although an incredibly gifted surfers (I wish I was a 10th as good) are no genius's when it comes to thinking things through. Amongst their peers both seem to have a weakness between the ears. No Slater or even Mick happening there at the moment that I can see.

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 11:10am

I'm gonna go against the trend: I don't agree Robbo was ripped off. He got three barrels on the one wave and didn't do any other moves. In this light he failed badly in the "variety of manoeuvres" aspect of the criteria. If he'd done three identical reos, or three identical airs he'd have been judged equally harshly.

I watched that heat from the Winki cliffs with an old hand (and Torquay local) who grimaced when Robbo pulled into the third barrel. The crowd cheered wildly but old mate (and all who understood the criteria) knew Robbo should've laid down a different track to milk the criteria.

mick-free's picture
mick-free's picture
mick-free Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 12:16pm

That was an amazing wave of Robbo's though, I would retire from surfing Winki after that one. I missed the whole event and just watched Jordy's wave - what an incredible first turn to second all on a rail. I didn't see much of a mistake. Other forums consensus was that he was ripped. Shouldn't have let himself into the position of needing a 9.97 though. Yawn Rio but may separate the real contenders.

asharper001's picture
asharper001's picture
asharper001 Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 12:32pm

I can see where you are going Stu. From my perspective, that is one of the limitations of the "variety of maneuvers". Let's say that you are surfing six foot Kirra. Do you give the score to competitor 1 who gets deep on a 6ft barrel from top of the point down past Pizza Hut or do you give it to the competitor 2 who gets a 4 foot wave puts in 2 re-entries, 1 snap, 1 cutback, a floater, and a short barrel. Competitor 2 has shown "variety of maneuvers" where competitor 1 has only one maneuver. Just recently Gabriel Medina won the Quiky Pro surfing kiddies where he could put 5 vertical backhand re-entries in a row against Parko who took off behind the rock straight into a barrels, out for a couple of open face carves, and maybe a closeout re-entry. Parko had "variety of maneuvers" where Gabriel had 1 maneuver 5 times repeated. Should Parko have been given the nod for 'variety of maneuvers'? Call me old school but wave should be judged on it's merits, not how many differing maneuvers you can fit in. As for the Jordy/Robbo heat, that too comes down to individual perspective. I have read many accounts agreeing with you in favour of Jordy, I have read just as many accounts in favour of Robbo. Somebody mentioned (might have been in the 'Judge not' forum) perspective can also be different between watching on-site at the event, as opposed to watching on the web. I went back and looked at "The Outsider" account of that heat and pulled this quote... "On the rocks I asked long-time shaper Gunter Rohn what he thought. He was emphatic, "Oh, Adam won it". It appears that perspective can also be different watching from on the rocks or from the Winki cliffs. From your perspective Jordy won it, from mine Robbo won it. Once it's in the history books, there's no changing it though.

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 1:20pm

If nothing else that wave showed up one of the real shortcomings of surfing to a criteria. I mean, presented with another barrel section who but the most trained of professionals is gonna resist? And who but the most hardened of watchers would want them too?

Let's blame pro surfing Ash. That way we're both winners.

asharper001's picture
asharper001's picture
asharper001 Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 5:17pm

You're quite spot on Stu. Surfing to a set criteria is the crux. It is both the solution and the problem. If the criteria is set, both competitors have been informed of the criteria, they know it is rigid, and competitor 1 adheres to it, competitor 2 chooses not to, then advantage goes to competitor 1. No problem with that. However, waves can be a random thing and sometimes don't want to adhere to a criteria. You could have a heat with both barreling waves and waves with long fat walls, depending on if the wave hits one spot or goes wide and hits another spot. Changing tides (think Europe), wind shifts etc also have an affect. Perhaps the criteria should be more of a guide than something rigid, hence judging how well the individual wave allows itself to be surfed and how well the surfer meets that challenge that wave sets.

In the end, somebody will still rate airs higher, somebody will still rate barrels higher, and somebody will will still rate big hacks higher. You will never get full agreement between everyone.

I think we're both winners anyway Stu. Nothing like a bit of positive reinforcement every now and again.

freeride76's picture
freeride76's picture
freeride76 Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 5:43pm

it's not set and it's not rigid. it can change heat by heat.
Ask Richie Porta.

wally's picture
wally's picture
wally Monday, 28 Apr 2014 at 7:58pm

Eureka!
I have listened to what ails the people and have come up with a genius solution.
Get Joe Turpel and Richie Porta to swap jobs.