The United States(!) of A
AW, thank goodness in our recent election the people rejected people like gsco.
Australia says no to you gsco.
No to your self righteous, judgmental, heartless and dare I say un Christian view of people.
I hope not too many people have to suffer your bullshit in the real world.
seeds wrote:AW, thank goodness in our recent election the people rejected people like gsco.
Australia says no to you gsco.
No to your self righteous, judgmental, heartless and dare I say un Christian like
I hope not too many people have to suffer your bullshit in the real world.
Seeds. Hi mate. Hope you are fine.
Gs-co is another Dutton really. Derives all their info from YouTube, Sky News or The Australian.
Fancy Dutton taking the people of Australia for a dodgem car ride over whether Nuclear energy would be suitable or viable.
Dangs with their hands in the sand and arses pointing north just waiting to be corrupted.
Did Dutton not think to check the legalities of Nuclear Powered energy plants, missed the fine print, it’s actually illegal in Australia.
Wouldn’t you’ve thought they might have done a little bit of research prior to flapping at the mouth and making promises, ah, the fine print, it’ll get you all the time.
Still waiting for Gs-co to join me in a debate about human induced climate change, once flapped his mouth about it, now the cats got his tongue, you pussy .Meow. AW
It appeared Dutton was stuck in his Murdoch bubble last couple of years. Ego getting stroked but he should have been hitting up as many lefty interviews as possible to get the intel he needed to understand the situation.
On another note when shaving the glans with glasses everyday it should have finally dawned on him the peeps don’t want that on the telly anymore. Eeeww.
Meow meows
seeds wrote:AW, thank goodness in our recent election the people rejected people like gsco.
Australia says no to you gsco.
No to your self righteous, judgmental, heartless and dare I say un Christian view of people.
I hope not too many people have to suffer your bullshit in the real world.
Unfortunately, gs-co was a university lecturer, so it’s likely that many young people had to suffer his bullshit, the ones he described as “unteachable…hostile…fragile…unreachable.” I think most decent human beings would react the same way if they had to interact with him.
overthefalls wrote:seeds wrote:AW, thank goodness in our recent election the people rejected people like gsco.
Australia says no to you gsco.
No to your self righteous, judgmental, heartless and dare I say un Christian view of people.
I hope not too many people have to suffer your bullshit in the real world.Unfortunately, gs-co was a university lecturer, so it’s likely that many young people had to suffer his bullshit, the ones he described as “unteachable…hostile…fragile…unreachable.” I think most decent human beings would react the same way if they had to interact with him.
That’s the funny bit. He doesn’t realise he’s the problem. He’s probably called derogatory names wherever he goes.
gs-co wrote:There's no ethnic cleansing or genocide. In a war sometimes one side wins. Are you saying you're just not happy with which side is winning?
What's the alternative? Allow Hamas and Islamic terrorist groups in the area to survive and regroup? Is that the outcome you prefer?
Of course it would be nice if humans didn't go to war and slaughter each other.
Hamas should have thought things through a bit more before going to war with Israel and indirectly the US.
Er, I suggest you stay in your lane maths boy.
International Humanitarian Law, the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, and the Laws of Armed Conflict and such is obviously not your strong suit.
gs-co wrote:Hamas should have thought things through a bit more before going to war with Israel and indirectly the US.
Lol at this guy thinking the "war" started in 2023
adam12 wrote:gs-co wrote:There's no ethnic cleansing or genocide. In a war sometimes one side wins. Are you saying you're just not happy with which side is winning?
What's the alternative? Allow Hamas and Islamic terrorist groups in the area to survive and regroup? Is that the outcome you prefer?
Of course it would be nice if humans didn't go to war and slaughter each other.
Hamas should have thought things through a bit more before going to war with Israel and indirectly the US.
Er, I suggest you stay in your lane maths boy.
International Humanitarian Law, the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, and the Laws of Armed Conflict and such is obviously not your strong suit.
Word...
And there could be a better way.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/19/village-where-israelis-and...
adam12 wrote:gs-co wrote:There's no ethnic cleansing or genocide. In a war sometimes one side wins. Are you saying you're just not happy with which side is winning?
What's the alternative? Allow Hamas and Islamic terrorist groups in the area to survive and regroup? Is that the outcome you prefer?
Of course it would be nice if humans didn't go to war and slaughter each other.
Hamas should have thought things through a bit more before going to war with Israel and indirectly the US.
Er, I suggest you stay in your lane maths boy.
International Humanitarian Law, the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, and the Laws of Armed Conflict and such is obviously not your strong suit.
Must be Hamas babies...
UN warns 14,000 babies could die in Gaza in next 48 hours without aid – Israel-Gaza war live https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/may/20/israel-gaza-hamas-aid...
Septic Tanks are going to Septic Tank