Tiger the Timber Surfcraft Master does one for Seeds
tiger wrote:Hey Udo, they look interesting. Looks like they've still got to be installed on the flat though, don't know how they would go sitting in the channel how I like the side fins to be.
For the front fins (FCS2) you might get away with 5 degree laying them in the channel would end up with 9 ish degrees for 4 channel, would 6 channel be steeper?
Hey Seeds. Futures boxes have a vertical slot with the cant built into the fin base. FCS have the cant built into the plug. Routing either in the channel would require a workaround as the install jig won't sit properly. Hence the ease of install with FCS 1, it's just holesaw on drill.
I focus the outside channel on 6 channel is steep, I'm thinking maybe 3deg sides might work.
tiger wrote:Hey Seeds. Futures boxes have a vertical slot with the cant built into the fin base. FCS have the cant built into the plug. Routing either in the channel would require a workaround as the install jig won't sit properly. Hence the ease of install with FCS 1, it's just holesaw on drill.
I focus the outside channel on 6 channel is steep, I'm thinking maybe 3deg sides might work.
Through the 6 channel might be a steeper angle, could adjust the depth to adjust the angle I guess, given futures are a stronger box I would use them and run the fins (3 degrees sounds good) closest to what degree of cant you want.
That's of course if you can set the jig close enough, FCS1's makes life a lot easier I also have used triple plug boxes (FCS) don't know if they are still sold drill 3 holes to fit them.
Edit: https://surfblanksaustralia.com/products/fin-solutions-triple-plug out of stock
Bit of messing around but the futures would look sweet.
We're brainstorming, I love it! I've done a quick diagram, to scale-ish of what we're up against.
The dotted line is perpendicular to the channel floor. As you can see the desired fin can't is even less than that. This pretty much counts out any boxes with cant built into them (FCS2). Any straight slotted box/plugs would work as there is enough leeway. Futures could work. It would require custom made fins without can't made into base (easy but not readily available to most people). Just using FCS1 rear plugs all round is once again the far easiest solution.
Or be a lunatic and do glass ins?
Its not Hard to Set a Box / Plug without a Jig / Router .
That's right Udo, there's plenty of workarounds in regards to install. Particularly with timber veneered boards, you can clamp things down etc with no damage to the surface. The main difficulty is in working with an already canted surface. Not having to overly modify a system to get everything where it should go. There is compromises have to be made somewhere.
"There is compromises have to be made somewhere".
You seem to have a good compromise with the 4 channels Tiger.
Is it possible to use a levelled Futures box, and shave off the proud parts?
blackers wrote:"There is compromises have to be made somewhere".
You seem to have a good compromise with the 4 channels Tiger.
Is it possible to use a levelled Futures box, and shave off the proud parts?
I have done that previously with FCS2's can be done TBH its a complete pain in the nuts, trying to get the whole thing to look flat then the other side always wants to sit low and in the end not great for the box.
Great drawing Tiger :-)
How about a Fusion box flip it around in deg needed.?
glass-ins.
Glass ins...as in Brian Bates style
Or Glass ons ?
All good thoughts gentlemen. Udo if I'm planning on using 2 tab fins, I'd probably just use fcs1 plugs. Like any system they will be set into high density foam, so they are much stronger than a regular foam install. I've actually never had any real problems with fcs1, and I've put them into literally 1000's of boards.
Blackers a futures box has a little leeway that you can tilt it, but you don't want to remove too much of the flange. It would sit pretty good in the floor of the channel but the fin would have to remain in alignment to the slot. All stock futures compatible side fins have cant built into the base, hence why you'd need to custom make side fins with straight base. Something that is really easy to do, as the difficult part of making futures compatible fins is making an angles base. But making fins is not a very pleasant job.
The more I think about it, the more I just want to do fcs1.
udo wrote:Glass ins...as in Brian Bates style
Or Glass ons ?
Ha yeah typo.
So we have a start, all the sixes, a 6'6" six channel.
First step is Hotwire a foil/thickness flow. Cut the outline 20mm in from each side, to allow for rails later. I'm going to use XPS on this one. All bottom contours are pre shaped into the core.
Piecing together a bottom skin, butt gluing all the pieces together. I lay glass panels on them to keep everything flat while the glue dries.
Next step will be put some high density foam in the areas that fin plugs/boxes will go. Then vac press the skin to the bottom.
Classic! There's an oldie, I'm guessing very early 2000's.
Just going to do fcs1, the old adage of, if it aint broke don't fix it.
Very noice, how deep are the channels Tiger yours alway look so good?
Around 10mm. The deepest point on the outside channels is where they exit the rails. The deepest point in the centre channels is a bit further up, near the front of the rear fin.
Cheers the board is looking good great outline.
Keep it up Tiger, love these pictures/posts mate
Wrapped in corrugated cardboard for the vac bag? What colour the rails this time Tiger?
That's shade cloth blackers. It's allows the vac pressure to travel evenly over the whole surface. In this case it's also pulling the rails in snug against the blank.
I've used XPS foam for rails on this one, so they are a light blue.
Mr TigerSwaylock - How many Hours in a Build like this ?
tiger wrote:That's shade cloth blackers. It's allows the vac pressure to travel evenly over the whole surface. In this case it's also pulling the rails in snug against the blank.
I've used XPS foam for rails on this one, so they are a light blue.
Ah yes makes far more sense, thanks.
To answer Udo's question. I'm a bit scared to figure it out, but I'd conservatively estimate there to be 25-30 hrs of hands on work. Lots of "hurry up and wait", and keeping an eye on things when it's in the vac bag. I'll make an effort to keep better track of time on the next one.
tiger wrote:To answer Udo's question. I'm a bit scared to figure it out, but I'd conservatively estimate there to be 25-30 hrs of hands on work. Lots of "hurry up and wait", and keeping an eye on things when it's in the vac bag. I'll make an effort to keep better track of time on the next one.
Wow that's pretty good I reckon I take 120 to 150 hours for a build, a mate who makes boards professionally (pu and epoxy vacuum bagged) just shakes his head :-).
That's just the hands on time. There's plenty of other time used checking on it when it's under vacuum, planning, making little bits and pieces. And probably things I've forgot to include. I'm definitely going to run a stopwatch over the next one.
It's a beautiful thing
Fuckin Ripper...Yew !
That detail in the channels is incredible.
Beautiful work Tiger
seeds wrote:It’s gunna look purty once that glass goes on.
Seeds. Hi mate.
Admiring your new board from afar. Looks tantalising.
I hope you have many a good surfs on it before it ends up on a wall.
Beautiful craftsmanship. All the best. AW
@seeds , are you taking the new stick to indo ?
Schmick! I'll be in touch for an order sometime soon.
Cool guys, we can document more board builds! I'm doing a run up to the sunny coast Thurs if anyone up that way is keen to check out some of the boards I've got in stock.
I’ve bitten the bullet and ordered a board off Tiger. Bit of to and fro about outline, length, fins, bottom contours and tail shape and this is where we’re headed.
Pretty stoked and hoping it’s the catalyst to get me in the water more than I have been last couple of years.