Bert Burger on making a statement at big Nazare

Stu Nettle picture
Stu Nettle (stunet)
Design Outline

Since being put on the big wave map a few years ago, Nazare has quickly become a base for big wave surfers, especially those from Europe. While it may not have the front loaded heft of Jaws or Mavericks, the sheer scale of Nazare sets it apart from every other big wave and creates a challenge of its own: how to make equipment that reaches escape velocity while handling the open ocean chop of big Naz?

Enter Western Australian board builder Bert Burger. As a shaper Bert has a quiver full of accolades: pioneer of parabolic rails, Surfer magazine's shaper of the year in 2007, and the accepted king of composite board technology. His label, Sunova, is a bastion of progressive tech; a greenfield project in a hidebound industry.

Recently Bert hooked up with Sebastain Steudtner and began making boards for the two-time XXL Big Wave award winner. Their combined mission is to get Sebastian down the largest wave ever ridden. For Sebastian it would be a world record, but for Bert it would be something more profound.

Swellnet: What are you doing in Nazare?
Bert Burger: I'm here working with Sebastian Steudtner, German big wave surfer as most people would know him. We're working on two areas: dialing in his tow boards and his big wave paddle boards.

How did the collaboration with Sebastian come about?
Originally my German business partner in the Board Factory Thailand, Martin Jandke, saw something online about a Go Fund Me project. Sebastian was looking for help to achieve his goal of riding the largest wave ever ridden. We dont have any cash but figured maybe he needs boards. So Martin gave him a call.

Up until that point I hadnt heard of him, but I knew that a few years back a German guy did win a big wave award. I just remember a big stir around Christian Fletcher and some comments at the awards night that hit the media...

Martin spoke with him a few times over the course of a year and things started to line up enough on both sides for us to be able to meet up and discuss some boards. So about a year ago we had multiple in depth Skype discussions about tow boards, different tow locations, variations in each wave location, what he needed, what he was feeling in his current boards. I would chime in with the logical reasons why he was feeling that and what the design options were to solve some current issues.

img_7503.jpg
Bert and Sebastian discuss equipment. Their combined mission is simple: get Sebastian into the largest wave ever ridden.

Finally, late last year I put together a few tow boards and Sebastian tried them at the end of the season. For Nazare, they were pretty much duds. What can happen when working with people for the first time is that if you dont make them a really good board first time they walk away and try something else. But I was able to convince Sebastian that this is part of the normal process of working through variables to isolate what is the best approach.

How many boards have you made for Sebastian?
So far, over the course of the last year, I've put together around 25 boards, which is actually quite low, I've seen pro surfers working through 200 boards in a year to nail down the good ones. However, the right conditions for testing in big waves just dont roll around that often.

What materials are the boards made from?
Lightweight EPS [expanded polystyrene foam], fibreglass, balsa wood, and epoxy resin are the main ingredients. At this point I really want to make a statement about tech and alternative surfboard construction materials...it's just fucking better - full stop! Fifteen years ago, JR [Justin Redman], was the only guy along with a Brazilian guy, whose name I totally forget, that were doing well on longboards in alternative construction at international events.

Fast forward to 2014, I'm at the World Longboad Titles in China and half the field was riding some sort of variation of alternative materials: sandwich construction, hybrid EPS/Epoxy/Sandwich, under more than ten different labels. Plus Kelly brought Firewire, which completely validates the tech, and it will eventually go the same way in shortboards. But still I hear from the naysayers, "Yeah, but those materials dont work in big waves." I call total bullshit on those comments.

I've personally surfed enough big waves, and had others win big wave contests at Margaret River and Yallingup, to know, hands down, this tech is capable of performing and winning. But to show that to the world I need someone with the balls and the audience of Sebastian to prove my point.

How much do they weigh?
This is one of those areas that, to date, the status quo says you need heavy boards for big waves. But this isn't a clear cut argument, so I'll throw some of my observations at you. With light surfboards you can swing around on a dime, take a few strokes and be instantly able to accelerate to full paddle speed, climb onto the nose and you can still push them over the edge, and once into the wave you have way more ability to correct your line and navigate gnarly sections.

I've always said that when it's windy you're fighting the wind. If you have a heavy board you're fighting the wind and the weight of your board. I've had heavy boards that slide around and wont stick to the face and I've had light boards, really light, that just hug the face and hold any drop or turn at mach speed. What made the difference was not the weight, but the design.

sebassunova25102026-018.jpg
Sebastian and Bert on the ground in Nazare

So a recent theory has been that extra weight compensates for poor design choices. But I'm still calling that one a theory 'cos there are circumstances where weight feels safer and you can stroke in with more confidence. But I still dont think a board needs to be really heavy - it's more about weight distribution.

So the current paddle boards range from 5 kilograms through to 13 kilograms and the tow boards are in the range of 6 to 14 kilograms. So you see there is a big range of weights there. I'm saying one thing, the status quo is saying another, somewhere in between there is a correct answer and I'm happy to accept whatever it may be.

And what about dimensions - length and width?
The paddle boards are currently up to 11 foot x 21½, around 80 litres. But consider that this is for Sebastian at a low 70kg range, so this number totally changes depending on the size of the rider.

Tow boards, 5'8" to 5'10", 15 to 20 litres, and really narrow. If i had my way I'd go narrower again, but we're currently restricted by the size of Sebastian's feet.

dsc_6759.jpg
Sunova gun. Bert with Sebastian's paddle and tow boards.

Are you trying to achieve stiffness to cut through the water or incorporate dampening to soften the impacts?
[Laughs]...maybe the stuff I've been saying is getting out there. Just your question alone already offers up an alternative approach. For twenty years I've been harping on about the shock absorbing qualities of using light EPS in big wave boards, not building them too heavy or stiff that you actually deal with bumps in a different way.

In the '70s we had surf mats, kind of like an inflatable bodyboard with rope handles on the nose. They weren't capable of dealing with a freefall or square bottom as they would fold up and you came to a violent stop, but in down the line bumpy conditions they were so fast. It didn't make sense. The bottoms would completely morph to the chop on the wave so the rider and his weight were unaffected by the forces of the bumps and the momentum kept you going in one direction, like good suspension in an off road car

When bumps or heavy chop are transferred through a stiff board to the rider, these are known as vector forces. They're forces that act in directions other than the desired direction you want to go and they slow you down. But you also have overall stiffness of the board length ways: too floppy and the board bends as it hits giant chop. The rocker changes and you're pushing water.

sebassunova25102026-002.jpg
Sebastian on the largest wave of the day (Photo Kim Hanskamp)

If the stringers are too thin and light, then, PU especially can get an ugly reverberation, or a dulled slow spring back after hitting bumps. If the board can't instantly pop back to shape before hitting the next bump then you're on a rollercoaster ride.

So you really want the structure of the board, its flex length wise, to be almost stiff, but with the ability to bend if needed and rapidly return to shape after hitting giant chops. Then the bottom to be soft to absorb smaller chops.

Current PU construction just doesnt allow for all those features to be built into one board. It's either heavy, stiff, and transfers the bumps, or it's lighter, flexy to the point of reverberation, changing rocker losing speed and it still feels the bumps. So what we really have is a complete mindset about big wave boards needing to be heavy, that's evolved around the materials that make up the status quo construction. Namely PU foam and polyester resin.

I've built both PU guns and EPS sandwich guns. I learnt to shape in both mediums, so there was always shapes that worked better in each. PU needs to be heavy because it flexes differently, has a slower rebound/flex return, you need heavier stringers to get the extra glass and resin to springback quick enough. It cant absorb chop so you need enough weight to make it plow through chop.

Light EPS with a balsa sandwich and you have the same stiffness with a faster springback at a lower weight, plus the ability to absorb and morph to chops so you dont need as much weight. If you did throw weight onto this board it's still smoother to ride than its PU counterpart even if the weight was identical.

So your questions about weight, stiffness, and shock absorption are all related and interwoven...

What was it like watching Monday's session in person?
When I saw the photos and videos later, it really does look bigger in person. The crowds that came were huge, and this wasn't for an event. The word gets out it's gonna be on and people just come. The whole crowd just lights up when someone charges a big one or wipes out heavily.

I sat and watched for seven hours from about 8am until 3pm. Knowing how different big waves can be it was really important to get an idea of what Nazare is like as a big wave and also the range of waves it can throw at you. Then to see the paddle in guys, their various approaches both successful and unsuccessful, check out what they're riding, talk with them. Its all really important to take in so you can consider it all for the next round of designs.

I came away from that day with two basic themes or designs that would tackle that wave and what it demands of you, each one needing a different plan as to deal with the types of waves to paddle into and where to sit in the line up.

All up, since I've been here I've really enjoyed rubbing shoulders with these guys. It's kind of motivating. While I never see myself doing what these guys are doing in giant surf, it makes me want to get back out there on the smaller big days. Ten years without solid waves and a few beers each day catches up with you, but being in the company of the surfers here makes me want to be a solid waterman again.

Comments

daisy duke kahanamoku's picture
daisy duke kahanamoku's picture
daisy duke kaha... Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 1:26pm

What's the joke about nazare being a big burger?

Tim Bonython's picture
Tim Bonython's picture
Tim Bonython Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 5:20pm

That was my take too. That was 5/6 years ago. But you go there and take a good look at it and I can honestly tell you that Nazare is more real than real. Its totally on a different level. Sure it looks like a burger. But the size and power of that place is incredible. And i dont even surf the place, especially on my knee board, ha ha.
NAZARE is going to evolve into the premiere BIG WAVE spot on planet. Believe me.

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 1:58pm

That is so good to read , great job interview . Just as bert was about to say what the difference in shape could be the topic changed ... ive always thought the same about big wave boards being lightweight with the correct shape& & construction might perform well . Its true that epoxy eps is better , although I ride on mostly pu craft, this read inspires to improve the big wave board design

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 4:04pm

You copped a li'l namedrop in the original and longer version of this interview, Cam. Bert was talking about SW inspiration, fellas who pushed it out in the water, and who in the wider scope inspired him to make better guns. Amongst a few names, Damon, Donda, etc. was yours.

What I dug about this talk was Bert's honesty RE the first batch of boards that didn't work. Didn't lie about it, didn't try and sugar coat it, just considered a stage in the process towards building better boards. It would've been easy to leave that bit out but he considered it important.

boxright's picture
boxright's picture
boxright Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 2:32pm

I can't pretend to understand everything Bert was saying but jeez it's good to read about people pushing the boundaries in design. I'll be watching the big Nazare swells a bit more closely now.

wingnut2443's picture
wingnut2443's picture
wingnut2443 Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 5:12pm

Ah, Stu, just SO much BETTER than a republished ABC Online article! GREAT STUFF.

Good, no, make that GREAT to read that you've got some journalistic mojo back!

freeride76's picture
freeride76's picture
freeride76 Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 5:17pm

Be interesting to see where he ends up with respect to weight and reliability of handling.

To my mind it's the ability of the PU blank to absorb and dampen vibration which reduces the vector forces he is talking about and why we keep going back to it, especially for good wave and big wave boards. There's a lot of hydrodynamic forces operating on a board on a big or even biggish wave at speed and reliable handling has to be the design factor that trumps all imo.
EPS, with it's "faster springback" seems less reliable in it's handling.

But we'll see. Like Caml I was keen to hear what kind of design elements he thought would work in tandem with the materials. That gun looked to have a step deck......reduction in rail volume? Better handling at speed?

velocityjohnno's picture
velocityjohnno's picture
velocityjohnno Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 6:54pm

Anyone like to comment on what pure balsa is like for chop dampening, and rebound flex?

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:56pm

Gary linden rates balsa guns saying they are good in chop the boards stiff , more proof theres many ways to skin cat

udo's picture
udo's picture
udo Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 7:03pm

That step deck on the gun would really stop a lot of flex.

sharkman's picture
sharkman's picture
sharkman Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 7:51pm

seems to be a lot of talk about the technology , what about the board designs themselves?

goofyfoot's picture
goofyfoot's picture
goofyfoot Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 8:20pm

Caml as soon as i read the bit about how he believes in bigger stringers i thought of you as i know you aren't that keen on them, whats your opinion on what he's saying regarding the stringers?

SurferSam's picture
SurferSam's picture
SurferSam Tuesday, 1 Nov 2016 at 11:09pm

He's creative with materials no doubt, but you couldn't find a worse businessman.
It takes talent to come up with the technology behind a company just purchased by the best surfer ever and get absolutely nothing out of it!

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 4:41am

Stu thanks for that bit , goofy theres no case for discussion mate ; I just reread the stringer thing cos I didn't get what you meant . because I didn't see anything to dispute , bert uses materials that I can only wish to ever use , my ideas follow his & my reduction in stringer "less than average" ideas ; is because of boogyboarding influence , & because I dont want the board too heavy , because if the stringer is bigger it ruins the weight of the product , when you pay for a board I think getting a fiberglass hull is better than a beam of wood in the quest to surf a wave , you dont stop dings with a stringer but you do with a heavily glassed board you might never have to do ding repair hopefully , no fin cracks etc just made once thats it & you just 4wd with it go hard even a few scratches will wet rub off it will be good for years unless you snap it . MULTI layers of glassing is the hard part & consider greenoughs spoons & fins , flex . there are so many different ways to do it

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 4:57am

Think of tribesman with a spear made of solid wood and its a spear to be javelin hurled , then think of modern spears a javelin pole hollow made from carbon , It doesn't need to be solid the centre can be inert ((eps foam ) or fairly light at least , its the shell that matters & it may rival the strength of wood than we get in Australian blanks , the carbon pole can easily be stronger vs wood , ideally epoxy composites are used , goofy foot you know im not there yet but thats why I think a big overkill stringer is unnecessary

Bert Burger's picture
Bert Burger's picture
Bert Burger Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 6:47am

freeride76
"Light EPS with a balsa sandwich and you have the same stiffness with a faster springback"
in this case , the EPS has about as much springback as Marsh Mallow, thats why its so good at absorbing bumps, but it also has a very neutral effect when you combine it with other materials which have the spingback your actually looking for ,,, one material may bend and springback fast, another slow, the springback of the total is what you get ... EPS being light and airy , means the other materials that have the faster springback , can carry and manipulate the EPS easily..
EPS doesnt interfere as much when your putting it together with other materials ..
you take your core weight from 6kg or more depending on stringer, down to 1kg , that gives you 5kg to add other stuff that might make your board go better..

sharkman's picture
sharkman's picture
sharkman Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 11:50am

So does that mean you could use 6 layers of 6 oz top and bottom , with a lighter core ?? How would this affect the tortion of the board?

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:45pm

Mc thats certainly what I believe works & you are of a different belief in using good stringers ie applecores , im surprised you haven't asked about it before seeing we often read each others posts here , we have discussed things before in relation to torsion & flex in big wave boards , what do u think about the idea mc ? 3x6oz each side for example or however but with not a lot of stringer , or other ways of construction that uses the shell rather than the core ? as always appreciate your knowledge sharkman

goofyfoot's picture
goofyfoot's picture
goofyfoot Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 6:58am

Ah yep ok, I thought Bert was talking about bigger timber stringers, not the different materials you just mentioned. My mistake.

shanan_onshore's picture
shanan_onshore's picture
shanan_onshore Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 11:53am

Awesome to see someone thinking outside the box with design for a change! Add as much weight as you want to a pile of poo, and its still a pile of poo.
Nice work Bert , hope ya nail it soon

drodders's picture
drodders's picture
drodders Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 1:14pm

Great article, Dorian’s Jaws boards this year were stringerless, Varial foam core…they went ok.

freeride76's picture
freeride76's picture
freeride76 Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:12pm

that varial foam sounds interesting....anyone know what it is?

can be glassed with either PE or Epoxy resins so it can't be a standard EPS core.

just watched the JC vid on the Varial site and he said he is glassing them in PE because he finds the flex more responsive.

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:13pm
lostdoggy's picture
lostdoggy's picture
lostdoggy Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:45pm

Hey Stu, I remember seeing a few chilli's in varial then i saw this article from earlier this year - http://www.surfinglife.com.au/news/sl-news/14722-the-world-s-sweetest-sm...

He seems to rave about it, but now seems he's already ditched it?
His website offers PU and 4 different styles of EPS construction now. No varial foam.
Also seems emery ditched it too.
So is anyone in Aus using it now do you know?

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 3:50pm

I know there are other extraneous elements to consider. I spoke to Pato at PCC and he had a customer bring a varial blank in to shape. All well and good, the foam is apparently easy to work with, but the smell is otherworldly. Real chemical warfare shit. He had to clear the shaping bay and the whole factory.

After he mentioned that to me, I then mentiond it to the fellas at Varial and they said there was nothing they could do about it; the smell comes from the chemicals that make the foam unique.

freeride76's picture
freeride76's picture
freeride76 Wednesday, 2 Nov 2016 at 2:44pm

thanks Stu, I remember reading it at the time...what has piqued my interest the second time around is hearing Dorian made his guns out of it and also finding out that Italo Ferreira is riding boards made with Varial foam.

When I saw him at Snapper this year, his boards, and surfing looked amazing....seemed to have all that extra pop and zing which comes with EPS cores but without any of the flightiness/funkiness etc etc.

wonder what happened to it in Aus LD? Was here in January and I haven't heard of any of the major manufacturers using it.
Maybe there is more money in them developing their own compsand tech and mass producing it in Asia?

Bert Burger's picture
Bert Burger's picture
Bert Burger Thursday, 3 Nov 2016 at 9:30am

Just gonna throw in a few random comments about stringers, P/U related solely for now...
years ago i asked Len Dibben , old school west oz board builder " hey Len , did you start putting stringers in to make them stronger?"
his reply , " fuck no , they just didnt go" he then went to say " without stringers they were actually stronger" coz they used more resin and glass , but this was also to get the required stiffness... because without extra resin and glass , they were too flexy .. so adding a stringer allowed them to build a lighter board with less resin and glass , because the stringer stiffened it up and allowed the board to spring back to its original position quicker... secondly it was about maintaining the correct rocker during production.... birth of the stringer and why ... ( also think cost factor, piece of wood v glass resin and more work)
but stringers can stiffen your board a second way ,, by also reducing shear movement.. grab a phone book ( yellow pages) now bend it ,, see how all the pages slide past each other to accommodate the new curve ? so the stringer also locks the deck to the bottom , reducing shear , reducing flex, no flex , no springback... so a board without a stringer will have a greater range of flex , basically , it can bend further .. how fast it can springback to position , depends on the properties of the foam, resin and glass
if you took a test piece of foam , glassed it either side , so it was about the size of a wooden ruler .. now grab a plastic ruler , a wooden ruler and your test piece.. bend them over a desk edge , and catapult something with it ,,, which one has the ability to launch an object the furthest ?? all about the same weight and density , yet vastly different flex and springback properties...

caml's picture
caml's picture
caml Thursday, 3 Nov 2016 at 11:40am

I like that , thanks bert . MAjor point being ,; makes the glassers job easier by having to laminate less .. HEy bert can you tell us anything about the differences in shape that you do for the lightweight xxl wave guns ? HOw does the shape change to go with lightweight construction ? AS you began to talk about in the interview but are cut short .thanks

chickenlips's picture
chickenlips's picture
chickenlips Saturday, 5 Nov 2016 at 1:04am

Is that an advertisement for Mercedes? Isn't her sister a drug Ugly Mule! The Indos thought Soo!